Committing ignorance can be read as trolling and dangerous, so problem-solving by forcing a win-lose memory process, ends by repressing asking to account for an

Committing ignorance can be read as trolling and dangerous, so problem-solving by forcing a win-lose memory process, ends by repressing asking to account for any deeper empathic accuracy of a real stable log. What genius is let go is if we can design a system that lets users filter, and share filters, without categorically/deleteriously removing parts of people's real life data we have trouble with. If we want to wholly deal with safety, sanity, abuse, pain, and words we equate power to record, we need to be able to read and write by sorting with due diligence enough to keep every end together, every bit of speech a turn worthy of ID, and then let users tool ways to filter, tag, label, and identify problems openly.