5 ms·
It seems like NAT would be a blatant example of blocking access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.
by nandhp 12y ago
It seems like NAT would be a blatant example of blocking access to legal content, applications, services,
or non-harmful devices.
- wtallis 12y agoIPv6 exists and works, and if we're going to expect our ISPs to get with the times we should be prepared to do so ourselves. NAT for IPv4 is ultimately unavoidable and thus excusable, but that doesn't mean that they can't use it to make the transition to IPv6 rougher on people who still need IPv4.