4 ms·

mcdonalds is far more physically damaging than meth? Why do I get the feeling you've never been around either?

• tedks 12y ago
  I guess the total cost of meth would be hard to calculate, but I'm totally confident that the health costs tied to obesity are far more damaging than meth. Meth just isn't as common as obesity.
  • ulisesrmzroche 12y ago
    People do crazy shit on meth though, add that to your calculations. Don't think anyone's really killed anyone for a cheeseburger.
    • tedks 12y ago
      Yes, this is precisely the indirect cost I alluded to in my immediately previous comment. That said, far more (several orders of magnitude more) people die from cheeseburgers than (directly or indirectly) from meth. In human lives, McDonald's is by far the greater risk. We need a War on Food.