7 ms·
Dealing McDonald's food is more addictive (look at all the people it hooks compared to meth) and far more physically damaging.
by tedks 12y ago
Dealing McDonald's food is more addictive (look at all the people it hooks compared to meth) and far more physically damaging.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- sp332 12y agoWho's hooked on McDonald's food? And I'm pretty sure McD's isn't that bad.
- kibibu 12y agoI'm old enough to remember when arcade cabinets used to start with "Winners Don't Use McDonalds" before the intro screen.
- ulisesrmzroche 12y agomcdonalds is far more physically damaging than meth? Why do I get the feeling you've never been around either?
- tedks 12y agoI guess the total cost of meth would be hard to calculate, but I'm totally confident that the health costs tied to obesity are far more damaging than meth. Meth just isn't as common as obesity.
- ulisesrmzroche 12y agoPeople do crazy shit on meth though, add that to your calculations. Don't think anyone's really killed anyone for a cheeseburger.
- tedks 12y agoYes, this is precisely the indirect cost I alluded to in my immediately previous comment. That said, far more (several orders of magnitude more) people die from cheeseburgers than (directly or indirectly) from meth. In human lives, McDonald's is by far the greater risk. We need a War on Food.
- DanBC 12y agoPeople are not "addicted" in any meaningful sense of that word to McDonalds. Misuse of language harms the works that people do to tackle obesogenic companies like McDonalds.