"That claim contradicts what Glenn Greenwald says. Why is he wrong?" Null hypothesis. His extraordinary claim required extraordinary evidence, and there was no

"That claim contradicts what Glenn Greenwald says. Why is he wrong?" Null hypothesis. His extraordinary claim required extraordinary evidence, and there was none. It is not up to me to prove a negative. But this is a pointless conversation. There is something about the topic of the NSA on HN... the debate has no logic or sense.