> When those two individuals have children their genes are fused together by random chance. Do you really think gene technology won't get better than random cha

> When those two individuals have children their genes are fused together by random chance. Do you really think gene technology won't get better than random chance? Yes. Because what really matters is the restriction of the pool from which those random genes are chosen through mate choice. The overwhelming majority of the time you're randomly choosing between identical genes. When you start playing with genetic engineering, the whole world is your oyster and your choices are liable to be far worse than random chance among a carefully curated pool. I think genetic engineering will be fantastic for curing specific ailments, but will be a total flop when it comes to creating super humans. Natural selection will always do it better.