3 ms·
I think a more convincing argument is that they're relying on CloudFlare to hide the IP address of the server, which is probably not very covert. http://www.wi
by sarciszewski 12y ago
I think a more convincing argument is that they're relying on CloudFlare to hide the IP address of the server, which is probably not very covert.
http://www.wired.com/2013/08/freedom-hosting/ http://www.wired.com/2013/08/freedom-hosting/
"It just sends identifying information to some IP in Reston, Virginia."
If the FBI does nothing else, they learn from past mistakes.
- eli 12y agoWouldn't a non-FBI owner of Pirate Bay also want to obscure the IP of the server just as much? I don't really follow this argument.
- sarciszewski 12y ago> Wouldn't a non-FBI owner of Pirate Bay also want to obscure the IP of the server just as much? Yep. > I don't really follow this argument. It's not a piece of evidence in favor of the FBI being involved. It's an explanation for why they would use CloudFlare and/or what they would use CF for. As I said elsewhere, I don't really buy the arguments. But I don't use TPB either. The only torrent I download are Linux/BSD ISOs. So I'm not going to risk my freedom on not buying arguments. :)