3 ms·
I've spent an inordinate amount of time thinking about this problem lately and haven't found a good answer. The need for pagination seems to stem from: 1. The
by thedudemabry 12y ago
I've spent an inordinate amount of time thinking about this problem lately and haven't found a good answer. The need for pagination seems to stem from:
1. The desire to limit the size of HTTP responses.
2. The lack of the ability to notify a browser that you're done loading/rendering async content.
Aside from page-flip-metaphor apps like the one posted here, it doesn't seem like a desirable UX pattern.
Have there been recent (or not so recent) developments in either of those problem areas?
- nl 12y agoTo be clear, I'm not generally a fan of infinite scrolling either. I'm not sure it is possible to talk about this in general terms - the specific use-case needs to be considered. In the case of Wikipedia, I think that the page size of a typical Wikipedia page isn't problematic. I suspect it's actually pretty rare that the HTTP response size for text documents is big enough to be a problem. 1M of text is pretty large in terms of text, and most pages would have more than that in embedded images.