3 ms·
If you think HN is open to anti-drug views, you're kidding yourself. I'll certainly concede that HN doesn't tend to respond well to a position of, "Drugs are b
by rosser 12y ago
If you think HN is open to anti-drug views, you're kidding yourself.
I'll certainly concede that HN doesn't tend to respond well to a position of, "Drugs are bad, mmm'kay?" I submit that has more to do with that being a hopelessly naïve stance than anything else.
Sure, some drugs are bad. Sure, some drugs are bad for some people. Sure, some people probably shouldn't take any drugs at all.
Going from that to blanket condemnation and prohibition is sloppy and illogical, and is very likely not to be a welcome notion in a community as broadly libertarian (note, small-l) in attitude as we "hackers" tend to be.
- andyl 12y ago> blanket condemnation and prohibition is sloppy and illogical I said: > yes it is possible - drugs can have a downside! Nowhere in this discussion do I call for prohibition. Downvotes are given to the possibility that drugs can have a downside. Now who is sloppy and illogical?