So there is something intrinsic about the status quo that is different from the past and that means the rules have changed. This justifies expanding the defini

So there is something intrinsic about the status quo that is different from the past and that means the rules have changed. This justifies expanding the definition of terrorism as anything intending to effect change in society that can be deemed harmful or for political ends. As a representative, is it an act of terrorism if your constituency persuades you to vote in a way that is economically harmful to the country if it benefits your state or ideology? A man in the desert blows a stop sign in the name of Allah and the NYPD is not around to stop him from resisting, is it an act of terrorism?