5 ms·
I am really interested to see what happens once ASP.Net is running on Linux. C# and Visual Studio are fantastic, mature tools and I think a lot of developers w
by stevecalifornia 12y ago
I am really interested to see what happens once ASP.Net is running on Linux. C# and Visual Studio are fantastic, mature tools and I think a lot of developers would enjoy using them whereas they might be hesitant at the moment due to OS lock-in on the code they are writing.
- Raphael 12y agoCould/Does Visual Studio run in Linux?
- artmageddon 12y agoNot yet. MonoDevelop is the closest you'll get at the moment.
- luisrudge 12y agono need for that. Just use your favorite editor with omnisharp[1] [1] http://www.omnisharp.net/ http://www.omnisharp.net/
- bigdubs 12y agoif you can attach and debug a process through sublime text, then maybe. as it stands there is no real replacement for visual studio (save maybe xamarin studio / mono develop)
- failed_ideas 12y agoI still haven't gotten it working in vim consistently enough to switch to the mac for development. When it does work, the lag makes it too slow, doesn't really allow for method discovery like intellisense, Ctags and omnicomplete still get better mileage for me.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- Delmania 12y agoI'm not sure they will migrate Visual Studio. First they'd need to move WPF, which is implemented in DirectX. Second, Visual Studio and MSDN are still profitable. Third, there's the Omnisharp project that;s working on providing support for the more common IDEs on linux. In fact, there's nothing stopping people from making Eclipse and IntelliJ plugins.
- huragok 12y agoI wonder how long it will take a courageous developer to port WPF to OpenGL.
- xanadohnt 12y agoThis has been asked about for nearly as long as Mono and WPF have been in coexistence. I would say there's very little chance this will happen. However, a recent update in the WPF world is MS has actually been ramping their WPF team back up after it looked like it would suffer the same fate as Silverlight. So who knows?
- GeorgeHahn 12y agoCheck out https://github.com/grokys/Perspex https://github.com/grokys/Perspex
- Moto7451 12y agoSilverlight's implementation of WPF runs on OS X already so presumably a lot of the ground work, at least for an OS X port, exists. I'd buy a copy of VS for Mac in a heartbeat.
- girvo 12y agoSame. I haven't run windows in 7 years, but Visual Studio is still one of the best IDEs I've ever used. I'd gladly pay for it if it was released on OS X/Linux, although that's somewhat contingent on the plugins that I want running on it too.
- 12y ago
- alkonaut 12y agoNo, in it's current form it probably won't be ported to a non-windows platform. This isn't to say there never will be an IDE called Visual Studio that looks like a current Visual Studio that runs on more platforms in the future.
- chriscub 12y agoFunny thing is that internal to Microsoft, most devs don't use Visual Studio as an IDE. Maybe as an editor or a debugger, but there are a lot of build systems out within Microsoft and most of them don't plug into Visual Studio. IMO, open sourcing Visual Studio itself is not all that interesting vs. open sourcing the .NET platform.
- robwilliams 12y agoI work at Microsoft and everything is done through Visual Studio (C#, C++, Javascript, X++, etc.). Where is VS not used inside Microsoft?
- wesnerm2 12y agoI worked at Microsoft Excel 15 years ago and Visual Studio was only used as a debugger. Visual SlickEdit was the editor and compiling/building was command-line based. Each group is different.
- robwilliams 12y agoAh, that may be true. However, there was a push within my division to standardize all of our tools with VS (there used to be a separate editor for X++ but now it's all VS), and I've heard other things about other divisions.
- luuio 12y agoumm, source?
- chriscub 12y agoSource is I worked there for eight years. Left two years ago. There was a push around the time I left to standardize more on TFS, but historically, VS was regarded internally as a bit non-hardcore.
- jerleth 12y agoNo, which is _the_ reason I am on windows.
- stirno 12y agoThere are several groups working to fill the gap left by VS not running on non-windows platforms (including my own company). There will be options!
- sanatgersappa 12y agoNo. But check out http://www.omnisharp.net/ http://www.omnisharp.net/
- ossreality 12y agoIt works right now on Mono. There are loads of example projects on GitHub.
- MichaelGG 12y agoASP.NET already runs on .NET with Mono, but not always the latest versions of things. Having it all open source could bridge that compatibility gap and let us fully enjoy the ecosystem, instead of having to be careful with taking dependencies all over.
- cdmckay 12y agoASP.NET support on Mono is very shaky, with random things missing. I tried to develop a Mono ASP.NET MVC app on it recently and I had to switch to Windows due to the number of issues.
- candl 12y agoASP.NET is a big framework and indeed it's never been as smooth as it could be, especially with the very latest versions. It's not to say that web dev is not possible with Mono. I've been using Owin+Nancy+Signalr successfully on Linux.
- jerleth 12y agoFor webapps, I am using Nancy and .Net 4.5 and I am very happy with it. Developing debugging on windows and deploying it on ubuntu apache with mod mono works great for me.
- adrianlmm 12y agoThere is more chance to see VS in OSX tan in Linux.