2 ms·
From what I've seen its a moderate international alignment. The US two party system provides a far-right choice and an ultra-extremist-right choice. This is a
by VLM 12y ago
From what I've seen its a moderate international alignment.
The US two party system provides a far-right choice and an ultra-extremist-right choice. This is a little too international for some to handle, or you can think about it as they're not modifying their message to fit local culture, which probably doesn't help recruitment.
Its a big world, and the sermons posted on the local church website here, might have little appeal to the attendees of your local church.
From the transcript of the MLK sermon at my local UU church:
"We just heard words from Dr. King, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice
everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a
single garment of destiny.” I have always found a profound parallel between that
quote and the seventh principle of the Unitarian Universalist Association – that
we affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all life, of which we
are a part. Sighing with relief because I am not being treated unjustly is not an
adequate response for a Unitarian Universalist when so many are forced to go
without what they need."
Its not exactly "workers of the world unite" or "eat the rich", then again its not the contemporary "Christian" message of "let them eat cake".
I admit I am intensely biased, if I were legally forced to join / attend a church it would almost certainly be this one.