4 ms·
That doesn't remotely address anything I nor the person above said. Nobody is debating if HDMI as sinks and sources, it does, what is being asked is how you'd d
by UnoriginalGuy 12y ago
That doesn't remotely address anything I nor the person above said. Nobody is debating if HDMI as sinks and sources, it does, what is being asked is how you'd design the source so that it could not act like a sink on the electronic lines on an all-digital system.
I just read over the spec again looking for what you might be referencing but I cannot locate it. Here's a link:
http://www.microprocessor.org/HDMISpecification13a.pdf http://www.microprocessor.org/HDMISpecification13a.pdf
Can you be more specific.
- pdx 12y agoThere are lots of call outs of source vs sink, but page 38 will perhaps convince you. It shows the sink is the input to a differential op-amp, while the source is a current source. The same lines are connected to different circuits, depending on if you're a source or a sink. EDIT: This looks like an interesting little box, if somebody does need the ability to read HDMI. You would still need to save it and then re-stream it, I think, to get it to your monitor. https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/h264prorecorder https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/h264prorecorder
- UnoriginalGuy 12y agoThe diagram on 39 kind of contradicts that. In fact it indicates they have exactly the same circuitry.
- pdx 12y agoNo, it doesn't.