4 ms·
Part of the problem as I see it is this (and I only have a short amount of time right now but I have a lot of thoughts on this): Our paradigm for "science" is
by thomasjudge 12y ago
Part of the problem as I see it is this (and I only have a short amount of time right now but I have a lot of thoughts on this):
Our paradigm for "science" is typically physics, in particular say newtonian mechanics. Force, mass, acceleration. 100% predictable.
However, while human diet, nutrition, metabolism are ultimately based (in some way) in physics, chemistry, biology, microbiology, diet and nutrition in the individual case are incredibly complex and clearly not fully understood phenomena.
So I think it is not exactly a failure of "science" or even the "media" at work here, but a failure to understand (which neither science nor the media has been particularly helpful on) the scope and LIMITATIONS of our knowledge and theories.