3 ms·
> silence even the possibility of dissent that honest journalism provides The crime being prosecuted is not dissent. Dissent enjoys nearly unlimited legal prot
by superuser2 12y ago
> silence even the possibility of dissent that honest journalism provides
The crime being prosecuted is not dissent. Dissent enjoys nearly unlimited legal protection in the U.S.
The crime being prosecuted is the disclosure of classified information by government employees. This is often accompanied by, but completely independent of, criticizing the government. We can and have prosecuted people for leaking secrets that made the government look good, i.e. people who divulged too much detail about the Bin Laden assassination.
If you voluntarily become an agent of the government, you voluntarily give away your right to criticize it without consequences. We haven't had a draft in a hell of a long time; there's really nothing wrong with that.
Stop equating dissent and disclosure of classified information. They are completely different things. You can criticize the government without sharing its secrets; you can share its secrets in a way that glorifies it.
- cryoshon 12y agoYou can't always intelligently dissent from what you are told by the government without an insider providing you details, however. We don't even know what our own government is doing in our name. We need its secrets so we can hold them accountable to what we are actually willing to have happen. Otherwise, we are mere passengers or rubber stamps for their bad behavior-- which is the case, currently.