4 ms·
I'd never thought of using misspellings from graffiti as a pronunciation clue, but it seems so obvious. I wonder how anthropological linguists would someday tr
by mattlutze 12y ago
I'd never thought of using misspellings from graffiti as a pronunciation clue, but it seems so obvious.
I wonder how anthropological linguists would someday treat modern rap and hip-hop. In German, for example, it's not uncommon for the artist to slightly or not-so-slightly mispronounce words to make them fit a rhyme. Would that help or hinder a study?
- zhte415 12y ago> Would that help or hinder a study? I imagine it would help. If evidence for that mispronunciation happened consistently, it would be taken as a dialect, class, geographical or cultural thing (or subculture). If it happened consistently over a very short space of time (and there was surviving evidence) it could be confused as a blip, or fashion. Example: I'm constantly perplexed why 'where' is spelt as 'were' by so many, but I imagine there are a sufficient number of English-speakers' accents (or a sufficient amount of speakers of a single accent to be significant) where the two words sound similar enough to spell them out on a keyboard as the same.
- schoen 12y agoI see some hand-written signs by native Spanish speakers in my neighborhood that interchange b and v (and sometimes k and c, and sometimes c and s), which would make for good evidence for a future historical linguist that these were homophones or near homophones in certain contexts. For example, I think I've seen "besino" written by a native speaker for "vecino" 'neighbor'.