4 ms·
This isn't necessarily true. The article largely explains it. The interaction of particles trends to infinity faster than time. Another way to think of it...
by mathattack 12y ago
This isn't necessarily true. The article largely explains it. The interaction of particles trends to infinity faster than time.
Another way to think of it... Let's say that t is trending to infinity starting from 0. There are #s that will always be larger than t. Such as (t+1)^2.
One more way... Time is one dimension. The rest of space-time is 3 (at least). The size of possibilities is larger to 3 orders of magnitude.
And a last way... If it's feasible that matter can expand forever, then there's no way for the particles to repeat themselves. They just keep going and going...
- macspoofing 12y agoStop time right now. You now have an static, unchanging, universe. This universe is infinite in size, and roughly equally dense with matter and radiation across this infinity. You really want to make the argument that there isn't another Earth out there?