30 ms·
Interesting, but it seems to be unaware of some Clojure libs. It suggests, (.trim " foo ") ;; Java interop instead of, (trim " foo ") ;; With clojure.str
by fnordsensei 12y ago
Interesting, but it seems to be unaware of some Clojure libs. It suggests,
(.trim " foo ") ;; Java interop
instead of,
(trim " foo ") ;; With clojure.string
Clojure.string is available from Clojure 1.2, which is ostensibly the version used in the comparison, yet is for some reason not actually utilized. (By the way, we're approaching Clojure 1.7 at the moment)
- jarcane 12y agoI did notice it seemed to use the Java fallbacks a lot, yeah, but I don't use Clojure much so didn't realize it was that out of date on the CLJ side.