1. I'm not an analyst and everyone knows that -- I'm an angel investor and former journalist. 2. It's not a lazy or uneducated argument -- it's an opinion... t

1. I'm not an analyst and everyone knows that -- I'm an angel investor and former journalist. 2. It's not a lazy or uneducated argument -- it's an opinion... that's why it says "I would say..." before the claim. 3. The opinion is based on the face that the FB = "all users" but Twitter = a subset of all users. That subset contains the most powerful politicians, CEOs, technologists, finance, art, celebrities, journalists and writers -- who are addicted to the platform. Those same folks are not spending their time on FB in any major way. Those folks are massively influential, thus my opinion.