Not at all. I support the concept of a neutral network and a fair playing ground on the internet for all. I also think the government and the FCC isn't an ins

Not at all. I support the concept of a neutral network and a fair playing ground on the internet for all. I also think the government and the FCC isn't an institution that can provide it. How is that inconsistent? What evidence is there that the US Government can magically regulate this very chaotic environment? They regulate the radio waves. There's money to be made there but it's a total disaster and a near monopoly to boot. They regulate the wireless spectrum...and the US has, hands down, the worst cellular network of any first world country. (I'll admit that this isn't all the US' fault, but they contribute to the problem) What makes you think turning over the reigns of network priority will be any different?