5 ms·

> I am forever amazed that people think an eighty thousand dollar plus car that barely does more than two hundred miles per charge is some kind of breakthrough.

by pslam 12y ago

> I am forever amazed that people think an eighty thousand dollar plus car that barely does more than two hundred miles per charge is some kind of breakthrough. It's a no-compromise, all-electric luxury car which absolutely replaces an ICE car for every day use. It's priced similarly to other large, luxury, performance vehicles. It's mass-market and sold in many countries. You can, today, buy this. I don't understand how you can pass this off as not a breakthrough.

threeseed 12y ago
The point is that it can't replace an ICE for most of the world. Every country is not like the US with a giant supercharger network. So range is critical. And Tesla isn't sold in "many" countries. It's an insignificant fraction of a typical car manufacturer.
- organsnyder 12y ago
  My daily commute is under 10 miles round-trip. With errands, I occasionally do 20-30 miles. If I had an electric and needed to go on a longer trip, I could either borrow my wife's car or rent an ICE vehicle. I take road trips longer than 200 miles very rarely. Yes, I realize that some people do have longer commutes than me. But very few people commute more than 200 miles per day. Of course, this does limit all-electric vehicles to those that can afford a second vehicle or a rental when the need arises. But I don't think anyone is arguing that electric vehicles have reached the point of being affordable to anyone but the well-off.
  - threeseed 12y ago
    Electric cars are definitely affordable. But your situation just exemplified the problem. A lot of people don't have a wife or they would be using their car and the hassle/cost of renting an ICE vehicle is pretty prohibitive. Why would I buy an electric car when I can just a "normal" one that has no downsides ? That's the question hybrids can have an answer to that pure electric can't.
  - gambiting 12y ago
    The length of the commute is not a problem. While charging from a regular 230V outlet(standard here in EU) you only add 8 miles of range per every hour of charging. If I had it I would not be able to recharge during the night what I drove out during the day. Unless I installed a more powerful charger....which I can't fit where I live. That's my problem with that car.
    - greglindahl 12y ago
      Let's say that you park at home 10 hours a day every day, and 10 extra hours over the weekend. That means you can drive 80 miles per day and 8*80=640 miles per week with no problems. The fraction of drivers who drive more than this is pretty small. I can easily imagine that a few drivers drive more than this. Why do you think that's important for the overall success of electric cars?
      - gambiting 12y ago
        Because if I can only recharge 80 miles of range every night then the effective range I can cover daily is 80 miles,not 250 miles you can do on a full battery. And please, even if my work commute is only 50 miles(25 each way) then it's very common that by driving to the shops or the gym in the afternoon I will make more than 80,even if my work commute is not that long. And yeah, vast majority of people will have a work commute shorter than 80 miles,but most people drive to other places than work too. It becomes pretty ridiculous if I had to say to my girlfriend "sorry honey, we won't be able to go and see your mother in the afternoon,because the car won't recharge enough overnight for me to go to work tomorrow". It's a major problem - they absolutely have to charge faster to be usable, I have no other complaints about electric cars other than this.
        greglindahl 12y ago
        If you personally drive close to 80 miles/day on average, you're driving twice what the average driver drives. Work it out for someone who averages only 40 miles a day. It's not interesting that a small number of drivers drive a lot! BTW there are fast chargers, check out CHAdeMO and the Tesla Supercharger.
- ams6110 12y ago
  The US does not have a giant supercharger network. Only some parts of it do.
6stringmerc 12y ago
Living in a major city in the Southwest, I see Tesla sedans frequently, a little bit more often than Maserati sedans, but not nearly as often as large S-Class or G-Class MB vehicles. Before they went bust, I did see two Fisker Karmas around town. To me, the Tesla is fundamentally a status symbol that happens to be usable. I think Tesla exists in a very odd bubble within Government and Market forces. Taking a $400 Million + loan, then replacing it with investor money, and still angling to get Federal & State tax credits to make it priced "competitvely" to other luxury sedans doesn't seem like the technology is really the innovation. It's an impressive bit of engineering, sure, but the past and present indicate it's not truly priced similarly, it's subsidized to incentivize buyers.
masklinn 12y ago
> It's a no-compromise What do you mean no compromise? It's a big sedan which can only serve as commuting car. > which absolutely replaces an ICE car for every day use It replaces an ICE car half the size and a fraction of the price. > It's priced similarly to other large, luxury, performance vehicles. Which have multiple times the autonomy and can actually eat road, the original purpose of large sedans.
- Raphael 12y ago
  Eat road?

by pslam 12y ago

threeseed 12y ago

The point is that it can't replace an ICE for most of the world. Every country is not like the US with a giant supercharger network. So range is critical. And Tesla isn't sold in "many" countries. It's an insignificant fraction of a typical car manufacturer.

organsnyder 12y ago
My daily commute is under 10 miles round-trip. With errands, I occasionally do 20-30 miles. If I had an electric and needed to go on a longer trip, I could either borrow my wife's car or rent an ICE vehicle. I take road trips longer than 200 miles very rarely. Yes, I realize that some people do have longer commutes than me. But very few people commute more than 200 miles per day. Of course, this does limit all-electric vehicles to those that can afford a second vehicle or a rental when the need arises. But I don't think anyone is arguing that electric vehicles have reached the point of being affordable to anyone but the well-off.
- threeseed 12y ago
  Electric cars are definitely affordable. But your situation just exemplified the problem. A lot of people don't have a wife or they would be using their car and the hassle/cost of renting an ICE vehicle is pretty prohibitive. Why would I buy an electric car when I can just a "normal" one that has no downsides ? That's the question hybrids can have an answer to that pure electric can't.
- gambiting 12y ago
  The length of the commute is not a problem. While charging from a regular 230V outlet(standard here in EU) you only add 8 miles of range per every hour of charging. If I had it I would not be able to recharge during the night what I drove out during the day. Unless I installed a more powerful charger....which I can't fit where I live. That's my problem with that car.
  - greglindahl 12y ago
    Let's say that you park at home 10 hours a day every day, and 10 extra hours over the weekend. That means you can drive 80 miles per day and 8*80=640 miles per week with no problems. The fraction of drivers who drive more than this is pretty small. I can easily imagine that a few drivers drive more than this. Why do you think that's important for the overall success of electric cars?
    - gambiting 12y ago
      Because if I can only recharge 80 miles of range every night then the effective range I can cover daily is 80 miles,not 250 miles you can do on a full battery. And please, even if my work commute is only 50 miles(25 each way) then it's very common that by driving to the shops or the gym in the afternoon I will make more than 80,even if my work commute is not that long. And yeah, vast majority of people will have a work commute shorter than 80 miles,but most people drive to other places than work too. It becomes pretty ridiculous if I had to say to my girlfriend "sorry honey, we won't be able to go and see your mother in the afternoon,because the car won't recharge enough overnight for me to go to work tomorrow". It's a major problem - they absolutely have to charge faster to be usable, I have no other complaints about electric cars other than this.
      - greglindahl 12y ago
        If you personally drive close to 80 miles/day on average, you're driving twice what the average driver drives. Work it out for someone who averages only 40 miles a day. It's not interesting that a small number of drivers drive a lot! BTW there are fast chargers, check out CHAdeMO and the Tesla Supercharger.
ams6110 12y ago
The US does not have a giant supercharger network. Only some parts of it do.

6stringmerc 12y ago

Living in a major city in the Southwest, I see Tesla sedans frequently, a little bit more often than Maserati sedans, but not nearly as often as large S-Class or G-Class MB vehicles. Before they went bust, I did see two Fisker Karmas around town. To me, the Tesla is fundamentally a status symbol that happens to be usable. I think Tesla exists in a very odd bubble within Government and Market forces. Taking a $400 Million + loan, then replacing it with investor money, and still angling to get Federal & State tax credits to make it priced "competitvely" to other luxury sedans doesn't seem like the technology is really the innovation. It's an impressive bit of engineering, sure, but the past and present indicate it's not truly priced similarly, it's subsidized to incentivize buyers.

masklinn 12y ago

> It's a no-compromise What do you mean no compromise? It's a big sedan which can only serve as commuting car. > which absolutely replaces an ICE car for every day use It replaces an ICE car half the size and a fraction of the price. > It's priced similarly to other large, luxury, performance vehicles. Which have multiple times the autonomy and can actually eat road, the original purpose of large sedans.

Raphael 12y ago
Eat road?