3 ms·
> "continuing to bankroll Greece" What are the EU treaty obligations in this regard? Is this still undecided? Is it a "corner case" that was never really spe
by beamatronic 12y ago
> "continuing to bankroll Greece"
What are the EU treaty obligations in this regard?
Is this still undecided? Is it a "corner case" that was never really spelled out how to handle it?
- matt4077 12y agoThere are no obligations, just necessities. Without the bailout, Greece would have defaulted and (it was feared) the French/German/Spanish banks that had financed the Greek debt would have fallen as well.
- leoc 12y agoIt's worse than simply "no obligations". EU and ECB bailouts of EU member states were specifically forbidden under the Treaty of Lisbon http://euwiki.org/TFEU#Article_123 http://euwiki.org/TFEU#Article_123 http://euwiki.org/TFEU#Article_125 http://euwiki.org/TFEU#Article_125 . Instead, not only did both the EU and the ECB prop up Greece's borrowing, they moved to block Greece's access to a normal IMF program, which would have involved losses for non-IMF creditors.
- yxhuvud 12y agoTreaty obligations doesn't matter when they try to enforce something that is not possible.