4 ms·
Yes, that's exactly what I wouldn't want to type. Also, your record is going to blow up in the likely case another utility uses a recursive flag, because of Has
by mercurial 12y ago
Yes, that's exactly what I wouldn't want to type. Also, your record is going to blow up in the likely case another utility uses a recursive flag, because of Haskell's pervasive namespacing problems.
- tel 12y agoIt probably wouldn't be too hard to do something like grep "foo" & "recursive" <~ True & "maxCount" <~ 100 in a typesafe way. It just probably wouldn't be worth the complexity. It also probably couldn't be a straight `IO` action then, which was a design constraint of Gabriel's.