4 ms·
The problem is that, in Math papers in journals, there's charges based on the number of pages used. You really would need an electronic format, and a wiki-styl
by fsk 12y ago
The problem is that, in Math papers in journals, there's charges based on the number of pages used.
You really would need an electronic format, and a wiki-style format that graduate students can use, to fill in the details of all the proofs.
When I was a grad student reading papers, it would sometimes take me a day or two to read a sentence, filling in all the details. I felt bad that there was no way for me to share my progress with others. Someone else reading the same paper (other than the author or a couple of other experts) would have to do the same thing as I did.
I thought it would be a neat project, but my advisor said it would be bad for my career if I spent time on it, so didn't pursue it. To find a job, it would be based on the papers I published, and not based on making other people's research easier to read.
- zhte415 12y agoLike a RapGenius of mathematical (or other rigorous) proofs? I think this would be amazing, especially for academics in fields related to the topic at hand but not deeply involved, or interested laymen. As a teaching tool it would be equally useful, even from the first year of university.
- scrumper 12y agoThis is a fantastic idea, something I'd use as a consumer. It dovetails nicely into the growing movement around democratizing access to scientific research as well.