3 ms·
Okay, I'm getting this pattern by people who want to make warrant canaries work: 1. You receive warrant you aren't allowed to tell friend about. 2. ???
by danielweber 12y ago
Okay, I'm getting this pattern by people who want to make warrant canaries work:
1. You receive warrant you aren't allowed to tell friend about.
2. ???
3. Friend now knows you got a warrant! How clever!
It doesn't matter what stuff you cram into #2. I'm sure you want to talk to the court at great length about how #2 means you didn't communicate.
Courts have dealt with this nonsense for a long time. It's called "distinction without a difference."
- jsprogrammer 12y agoWhat if you stuff the first amendment to the US constitution in there? It's only one sentence, and very blunt: >Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...
- s_kilk 12y agoIt should be evident by now that that one sentence is effectively meaningless in the US.
- jsprogrammer 12y agoHas it been tested in court in relation to NSLs?