4 ms·

200? no. Try 2,000. That should be representable of a barely usable level of the language. If you are what might be described as fluent, you're probably at >20,

by maaku 12y ago

200? no. Try 2,000. That should be representable of a barely usable level of the language. If you are what might be described as fluent, you're probably at >20,000. Take this headline: JACUZZIS FOUND EFFECTIVE IN TREATING PHLEBITIS "EFFECTIVE" and "IN" are the only two words found in the first 2,000 words sorted by frequency, although "FOUND" is close. So with only 200 words you'd understand: WNPHMMVF SBHAQ RSSRPGVIR IN GERNGVAT CUYROVGVF 2,000 words would give you: WNPHMMVF FOUND EFFECTIVE IN GERNGVAT CUYROVGVF And some grammar knowledge would tell you WNPHMMVF(N) FOUND EFFECTIVE IN GERNGVAT(V) CUYROVGVF(N) Which is enough to know that you only really need to look up "TREATING" in the dictionary to understand the gist of the sentence But it'd hardly pass as a fluent understanding...

Rangi42 12y ago
"Some grammar knowledge" probably also tells you the structure of the verb, namely TREAT+ING(V,present progressive). "TREAT" is the 1,118th most common word, so that gives you: WNPHMMVF FOUND EFFECTIVE IN TREATING CUYROVGVF And then some contextual knowledge of what sort of things get treated tells you that CUYROVGVF is a disease or injury, and WNPHMMVF is a medicine or therapy. So knowing 2,000 words and some grammar isn't quite fluent, but it's around the level of a middle-school child who has to ask what lots of nouns are.
yongjik 12y ago
This is actually a very nice example of the importance of grammar. A typical novice English learner, even if they can look up all the words from the dictionary, would go on like this: "Hmm, Jacuzzis is clearly a noun, so it must be the subject. So Jacuzzis found "effective"... wait, that doesn't make sense. "Effective" is not a company, how does one found "effective"? Oh, it must be the past tense of "find". OK, so these Jacuzzis found... effective? How does one find "effective"? And why was effective hiding in "treating phlebitis"? OK, whatever, maybe I could decipher this if I understand "treating phlebitis"... So it is a kind of disease that is... treating someone (or something)? How could a disease treat anyone? This sentence makes no sense!!" If you think "Duh, that's ridiculous, nobody thinks like that", then you obviously never met a struggling English learner.

by maaku 12y ago

Rangi42 12y ago

"Some grammar knowledge" probably also tells you the structure of the verb, namely TREAT+ING(V,present progressive). "TREAT" is the 1,118th most common word, so that gives you: WNPHMMVF FOUND EFFECTIVE IN TREATING CUYROVGVF And then some contextual knowledge of what sort of things get treated tells you that CUYROVGVF is a disease or injury, and WNPHMMVF is a medicine or therapy. So knowing 2,000 words and some grammar isn't quite fluent, but it's around the level of a middle-school child who has to ask what lots of nouns are.

yongjik 12y ago

This is actually a very nice example of the importance of grammar. A typical novice English learner, even if they can look up all the words from the dictionary, would go on like this: "Hmm, Jacuzzis is clearly a noun, so it must be the subject. So Jacuzzis found "effective"... wait, that doesn't make sense. "Effective" is not a company, how does one found "effective"? Oh, it must be the past tense of "find". OK, so these Jacuzzis found... effective? How does one find "effective"? And why was effective hiding in "treating phlebitis"? OK, whatever, maybe I could decipher this if I understand "treating phlebitis"... So it is a kind of disease that is... treating someone (or something)? How could a disease treat anyone? This sentence makes no sense!!" If you think "Duh, that's ridiculous, nobody thinks like that", then you obviously never met a struggling English learner.