4 ms·
This article only did one thing for me - demonstrate that the author himself doesn't understand Angular or the problems. I don't know Angular that well myself,
by bphogan 12y ago
This article only did one thing for me - demonstrate that the author himself doesn't understand Angular or the problems. I don't know Angular that well myself, but the author knew anything more than I did, he'd be able to spend the extra 30 seconds to write the refactored code.
Dismiss this article. It's a waste of time and energy. In fact, I really shouldn't even be wasting my time commenting on it.
- crdoconnor 12y ago>This article only did one thing for me - demonstrate that the author himself doesn't understand Angular or the problems. Seems pretty evident from the horrible jankiness of this blog. Heavy as shit and it loads on the 5th try.
- sfeng 12y agoTry to load it on mobile. What a train wreck.
- bambax 12y agoIt just says "Loading" on the latest version of Chrome with zero plugins... And now it says 500 > Error details are currently disabled. Please set StaticConfiguration.DisableErrorTraces = false; to enable.
- d23 12y agoAd hominem. I can't really comment on the article itself since I don't understand anything about Angular, but let's do our best not to just throw a bunch of random stuff at the wall and hope something sticks just to justify our lack of understanding of the author's point.
- crdoconnor 12y agoBelieve me if the blog wasn't built using angular I wouldn't have said anything.