4 ms·

Right now, there are a lot of billable hours for what Ross can do in seconds. I don't think it's unfair to say that this is replacing a substantial portion of _

• dragonwriter 12y ago
  I'd like to see a concrete description of the difference between what ROSS gives you versus what, say, LexisNexis does. If its just giving you a simple answers and not actually producing the kind of research results a research attorney using traditional research tools would -- where the simple answer would be part of the heading, but sources and analysis would be part of the report -- its not going to be useful except as a novelty. In law, its rarely as important to get a simple answer as to have an answer that you can support as most correct and explain why other potential answers are less correct for the specific circumstances. And, from the vague marketing hype, it doesn't seem like what is really needed in law is what ROSS is being sold as doing.
  • travis_in_sd 12y ago
    My guess is that it's roughly analogous to the difference between Wolfram and Google. One is actually computing on the data to combine it in novel ways. The other is the one I use. (Snarky, but as much as I try, the only thing I've found WA useful is for COLA comps)
• deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]
• deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]