11 ms·
Aren't jamming devices of that type illegal, as discussed elsewhere in the thread? And isn't what Cisco is doing by even manufacturing a device with that capabi
by ak217 12y ago
Aren't jamming devices of that type illegal, as discussed elsewhere in the thread? And isn't what Cisco is doing by even manufacturing a device with that capability illegal, or at least cause for the FCC to ban its sales in the US?
- dsl 12y agoJamming is very different from exploiting a protocol flaw (which is basically what the rouge AP mitigation does).
- kps 12y ago‘Jamming’ and ‘exploiting a protocol flaw’ are both methods of interfering. > 47 U.S. Code § 333 - Willful or malicious interference > > No person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with > or cause interference to any radio communications of any > station licensed or authorized by or under this chapter > or operated by the United States Government.