3 ms·
While I agree, there's a reason that file sharing and video sites have been slow to take up HTTPS, and that's that it removes the ability for any intermediaries
by peeters 12y ago
While I agree, there's a reason that file sharing and video sites have been slow to take up HTTPS, and that's that it removes the ability for any intermediaries to cache the content. It puts more of a burden on ISPs and services to carry the extra load, whether it be through SSL-terminated peering, or more scaling at the home servers. It may be a necessary burden, but still, it's a pretty significant one.
In extreme cases, think of the infrastructure cost of streaming say, a world cup final game over HTTP vs HTTPS.
- click170 12y agoI see that as a good thing, it's an argument for ISPs to finally invest in upgrading their networks, though if Google Fiber wasn't already enough of a reason I doubt this would make a dent.