It's easier to understand airplane flight with Newton's laws, rather than Bernoulli's principle: http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/airflylvl3.htm http://www.alls

It's easier to understand airplane flight with Newton's laws, rather than Bernoulli's principle: http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/airflylvl3.htm http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/airflylvl3.htm In particular, the normal hand-wavey arguments that say that air particles must "meet up" after they are separated are total bunk, so that it's not clear that the upper edge actually has a faster airflow. In fact I had a class at Cornell with someone who was studying how dragonfly wings fly, and in addition to momentum-transfer due to steady streams (like airplane wings) you can also have momentum transfer into vortices which are created by those wings. In general I feel like this article has a lot of social detail and not very much physics. So, for example, someone who doesn't really understand what pressure is will probably be totally unenlightened on why a moving fluid will have a lower pressure. In particular there is a huge caveat to saying that "pressure + kinetic energy = constant", which is that this is a statement valid on a streamline of the fluid. (A streamline is a curve traced by a small group of particles in the fluid as they go downstream -- averaging out their individual jiggles so that we just see how the fluid overall is flowing. If you inject a steady stream of dye then it often shows a streamline, for example.) If you're not on a streamline then it might not hold. So for example, cut two holes in a bag, stick some tubes on either side, and have a fan blow into one of those tubes: now you've got air moving at a certain velocity inside the bag; yet it is inflated (higher pressure than the stationary air outside the bag) even though it is moving (which you would think would lower the pressure). Turn the fan around and the bag will be inclined to deflate. The air outside the bag is not on a streamline with the air inside the bag. The transport equation looks like this: ∂c/∂t + (v·∇) c = D ∇² c + Source − Sink This equation tells a story: "there is a box moving downstream (v·∇) which contains some stuff, with a certain concentration (c). The time-rate-of-change (∂/∂t) of stuff in the box is equal to the stuff moving into the box, minus the stuff moving out of the box. Some stuff is moving into adjacent boxes proportional to the concentration difference, in a process called diffusion (D); everything else is somehow going out of the scope of the fluid flow (Source − Sink)." The interesting thing about fluid mechanics, that leads to the Navier-Stokes equations, is that in classical mechanics we have conservation of momentum, which means that the fluid's own momentum in each direction is a stuff subject to this same story. This causes the term (v·∇) c, in particular, to have two instances of v in it (it becomes "nonlinear") and so everything becomes difficult to analyze -- which is why there's a million-dollar prize to make some substantial progress in understanding the resulting equation.