> You can't really declare nonvaccination to be indisputable evil without comparing the probabilities to actions and circumstances that may be just as harmful b

> You can't really declare nonvaccination to be indisputable evil without comparing the probabilities to actions and circumstances that may be just as harmful but which we allow. Sure I can. That's just another version of the "we shouldn't go into space before we solve world hunger" argument. Even though smog is a larger and more pernicious problem, we should still try to solve the smaller problems that come behind it. (and, of course, I don't think anybody is saying nonvaccination is indisputable evil. I assume that's hyperbole)