That's wordplay masquerading as understanding. Instead consider a CPU architecture and accompanying notation designed especially for playing chess. The other i

That's wordplay masquerading as understanding. Instead consider a CPU architecture and accompanying notation designed especially for playing chess. The other idea is not very interesting. Assuming some arbitrary architecture plus the necessary code to emulate it on a normal architecture (including your stupid CHS example) would normalize the "size" of the program, anyway -- unless there are hardware structures that are especially good for chess. Which was the essence of the question.