4 ms·
Although I love this idea for load times, it doesn't necessarily solve the issue of SEO. I don't think that's an impossible issue to solve, though.
by michaelchisari 12y ago
Although I love this idea for load times, it doesn't necessarily solve the issue of SEO. I don't think that's an impossible issue to solve, though.
- guntars 12y agoAnd it's still slower since the JS needs to be requested after the first chunk of html is parsed.
- michaelchisari 12y agoFor most use cases, the difference is going to be negligible, though. If everything is packed properly. Most use cases. Not all.
- cyberpanther 12y agoUsing standard minification techniques and making your JS asynchronous you can probably overcome a lot of that wait.
- cyberpanther 12y agoSo officially Google says it can crawl these kinds of sites; however, from experience this is not the case. So until the future comes there is https://prerender.io/ https://prerender.io/.
- hamburglar 12y agoAs far as I'm concerned, until we can see what a JavaScript-enabled googlebot sees with our own eyes (and debug it), "Google can run JavaScript now" is just wishful thinking.