2 ms·
Completely agree with everything you said. I was only calling libor risk-free as it is what would be substituted for the risk free rate used in finance textbook
by bko 12y ago
Completely agree with everything you said. I was only calling libor risk-free as it is what would be substituted for the risk free rate used in finance textbooks. Technically it's not risk-free but serves as a base return to benchmark off of. Also, most of these bonds pay coupons linked to libor.
Attachment and detachment point are definitely very important. I found a random fed document from 2012 that suggests similar attachment/detachment points for AAA prime vs subprime abs securities (~79% attachment). I haven't looked at it too closely though and I could be missing something. I know spreads are a lot tighter since 2012 and credit quality of underlying loans may have worsened with lower standards. On the other hand, people are a lot better off now that in 2012 (i.e. stock market, housing market, etc).
Will check out Scarcity. Thanks for the recommendation!
[1] http://www.federalreserve.gov/SECRS/2012/May/20120523/R-1401/R-1401_051812_107330_532952917460_1.pdf http://www.federalreserve.gov/SECRS/2012/May/20120523/R-1401...
- jsprogrammer 12y agoCurrent state of economic thinking: technically not risk-free, but we'll call it that anyway...what could go wrong!?
- joncooper 12y agoWell, if you're talking about LIBOR, the risk is that the AA bank to whom you have counterparty risk will default within 3mo, so it's very, very, very low risk.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]