I don't know anything of this case, but this article is biased and propagandistic. It uses the phrase "rotary phone" to trivialize some secret documents. They

I don't know anything of this case, but this article is biased and propagandistic. It uses the phrase "rotary phone" to trivialize some secret documents. They may indeed be trivial and improperly classified. However the article does not make this case. Of course it is hard to make this case. I think this defendant is analogous to a man charged with stealing $10k from work. They search his home and find a power drill stolen from work. Prosecutors want to infer that he also stole the $10k.