4 ms·
Even their profit is enough for 3 Nimitz class super carriers. Then they can REALLY sink their competitions ;)
by Cookingboy 12y ago
Even their profit is enough for 3 Nimitz class super carriers.
Then they can REALLY sink their competitions ;)
- bertil 12y agoTheir competition is Samsung. Something tells me the whole large ships argument is lost on Korean chaebols.
- mcphage 12y ago> the whole large ships argument is lost on Korean chaebols Especially when Samsung just built the world's largest: http://www.industrytap.com/worlds-largest-ship-ever-built-first-floating-liquefied-natural-gas-flng-platform-begin-drilling-2017/23119 http://www.industrytap.com/worlds-largest-ship-ever-built-fi... :-)
- numbsafari 12y agoHeh, funny that Apple would be forced to hire Samsung to build their carrier given where they are forced to source their processors.
- sinwave 12y agowait - are they actually building aircraft carriers??
- lucozade 12y agoYou heard it first on HN. Anyway the premise is wrong. An Apple carrier would be much more expensive than anyone else's carrier. And as you'll only be able to get it in white, silver or gold, you might have some camouflage problems.
- dEnigma 12y agoIt also probably wouldn't be waterproof, unless they fix it with a software update :P
- Cthulhu_ 12y agoYou mean like Steve Jobs' yacht that was only finished shortly after he died? Cheaper than an aircraft carrier too at only 100 million (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_(yacht) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_(yacht))