3 ms·
It's supposed to be better, faster, and stronger (more functions) than underscore. It's also under active maintenance from an enthusiastic dev. Do your own res
by woah 12y ago
It's supposed to be better, faster, and stronger (more functions) than underscore.
It's also under active maintenance from an enthusiastic dev. Do your own research, but I go with lodash.
- jsprogrammer 12y agoLazy.js claims to be even faster than both with support for lazy evaluation to boot. Not quite a drop-in replacement like lodash is, but I think it only requires a minor tweak.
- d4n3 12y agoseems like lodash now has lazy evaluation as well when using the _(obj).method() syntax: http://filimanjaro.com/blog/2014/introducing-lazy-evaluation/ http://filimanjaro.com/blog/2014/introducing-lazy-evaluation...
- killercup 12y agoA new feature in 3.0 is that lodash now supports lazy evaluation using the chaining API from 2.x.
- masklinn 12y agoSo 2.0 code which used chaining is now broken if it doesn't explicitly exhaust the chain?
- je42 12y agoLazy.js is however not that active. I guess the community around it still needs to develop.