3 ms·
we've built essentially what you're talking (though we hand-rolled our router) about where I work. As the applications grow larger, you really have to be more d
by marpstar 12y ago
we've built essentially what you're talking (though we hand-rolled our router) about where I work. As the applications grow larger, you really have to be more diligent with your memory management in Knockout, which is the only thing that really gets in my way.
That being said, I'd really be interested in something like you've described.
- hardwaresofton 12y agoGlad to hear! It really weighs on me that I'd be adding yet another web framework to the already-too-large pool of them, but if it gets done at all, I will definitely be aiming for simplicity and lack-of-surprises above all. Right now I see the MV* web framework landscape (from lightest to heaviest) as: knockout---mithril------angular-----backbone+marionette-----ember I'm aiming for chainmail to fit inbetween knockout and mithril (I consider it less than mithril because it will not include a JS-based dom structure, and will be using templating from knockout.