4 ms·

(because(as(my(coworker(said:(the(human(brain(is(no(f*ing(pushdown(automata))))))))))))) SCNR

• dreish 17y ago
  That's the easiest and most superficial rationalization for not bothering to try a Lisp (any Lisp), but also the least compelling argument against it, and likely not even the most significant actual reason you haven't bothered to learn it.
  • huherto 17y ago
    It may not be a fundamental problem for people that know it well. But, first impressions matter nonetheless. Edit:Spelling
  • pilif 17y ago
    I was joking about the syntax and the way how I just can't wrap my brain around reading lisp and matching parentheses. I was not joking about the recursive and functional nature of Lisp, both of which I'm finding very interesting (and my coworker is, in fact, a big fan of Haskell)
    • peregrine 17y ago
      The editor should help you use parens. http://code.google.com/p/counterclockwise/wiki/ScreenShots#Source_code_Editor http://code.google.com/p/counterclockwise/wiki/ScreenShots#S... Rainbow parens are really helpful and so is automatic paren matching....
• swannodette 17y ago
  <and yet="people"> <like> <writing> <html></html> </writing> </like> </and>
  • pilif 17y ago
    like? Not really. But at least I have a chance at spotting syntax errors by eye without the help of an editor.
• authentic 17y ago
  automaton