3 ms·
Just because there are some things that can be fought doesn't mean that all things you/we deem "unacceptable" can be eliminated. Some things always exist, like
by ahomescu1 12y ago
Just because there are some things that can be fought doesn't mean that all things you/we deem "unacceptable" can be eliminated. Some things always exist, like the first law of thermodynamics (one example) and drug use (people deemed drug use "unacceptable" and initiated the "War on Drugs", and look how well that turned out).
Not everything in life is under our control.
- Retra 12y agoNo, but it doesn't mean they _can't be_ either. Which is my whole damn point: naturalness is irrelevant. >Not everything in life is under our control. Who cares!? Are you going to spend your time repeating trivially useless facts? You have said nothing at all that allows you to distinguish between what can and can't be controlled. 'Naturalness' isn't it, for what should be obvious reasons. You do not know what is under your control until you try to control it.
- ahomescu1 12y ago> Which is my whole damn point: naturalness is irrelevant. I disagree. Man-made phenomena can all be fought and reversed (so it's worth trying), but not all natural ones can (so it can be worth trying to fight them, but one must also know when to give up). This started with the statement "Social inequality without serving a conscious purpose", which implies (or at least that's how I interpreted it) that social inequality is some man-made phenomenon, and we'd all be equal if not for some evil overlords "keeping us down". I disagree with this theory.
- gargarplex 12y agoI'd like to add that in a state of nature, man is in a state of injustice. Social justice is by definition a byproduct of conscious thinking against a natural state of disrepair.