5 ms·
I didn't think Linux was vulnerable to the 45-day forced-reboot bug.
by cbd1984 12y ago
I didn't think Linux was vulnerable to the 45-day forced-reboot bug.
- tedunangst 12y agoAre you talking about the Windows 95/98 49 day time rollover bug? That didn't affect NT either.
- cbd1984 12y ago> Are you talking about the Windows 95/98 49 day time rollover bug? Yes. > That didn't affect NT either. Oh. OK.
- RVuRnvbM2e 12y agoTrue, now you have a full 497 days. https://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2553549 https://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2553549
- tedunangst 12y agoStill better than 208.5 days. :) https://access.redhat.com/solutions/68466 https://access.redhat.com/solutions/68466
- cbd1984 12y agoFixed: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/ChangeLog-2.6.32.50 https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/Change... (I mean, in case anyone else was curious like I was.) Kernel developer thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1132515 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1132515