I did not mean to question the rigor of more traditional apologetics; merely to note that there are certain approaches and points of view that they tend not to

I did not mean to question the rigor of more traditional apologetics; merely to note that there are certain approaches and points of view that they tend not to use, which is entirely understandable. Apologies if it seemed that I did (question their rigor). Beyond that, though, I had in mind more the amateur Facebook/Tumblr apologist than the more professional, philosophically-educated sort.