3 ms·
This one surprised me least of all. The issue with upgrading these systems to newer technology, especially on general purpose operating systems, is that they're
by dsuth 12y ago
This one surprised me least of all. The issue with upgrading these systems to newer technology, especially on general purpose operating systems, is that they're far less reliable, precisely due to the fact that they are more powerful and flexible, and hence, more complex.
The first rule of critical systems is to reduce complexity, and their current systems probably found the sweet spot between useability and simplicity decades ago.
The guy using the IBM accounting machines though... Dear god man! It sounds like the museum would've handed him a new system on a platter, in exchange for his old system. Take the upgrade!
- gaius 12y agoThey are built like crap too, you can put a PC in a rack mount case but that don't make it a server. The kit from DEC, Sun, SGI, HP et al from the 80s and 90s was rock solid and would keep going for 20, 30, 40 years, easily. Modern kit you would be lucky to reach 3 years.
- Gurkenmaster 12y agoDo they use HDDs? If so, does that mean the older HDDs had less failures?