It's worth noting that the lady who was the center of the gamergate thing: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Quinn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Quinn He

It's worth noting that the lady who was the center of the gamergate thing: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Quinn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Quinn Her wikipedia entry, which would probably not exist if not for gamergame, doesn't mention anything about the details of her ex's blog post, who her ex is, what she was accused of, or anything that could be viewed negatively about her. Given all of this, I would say that wikipedia is capable of handling these situations delicately and Mark is a bit hyperbolic by saying wikipedia is incapable of doing this.