3 ms·
Sheez. So when the broken code in question is over 2 years old, and is hard to fix, then Google just washed their hands of it? Google is a big company with sub
by ryanhuff 12y ago
Sheez. So when the broken code in question is over 2 years old, and is hard to fix, then Google just washed their hands of it? Google is a big company with substantial resources. How about they support their customers beyond the "new and shiny period" like many, many other companies do?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- divegeek 12y agoGoogle could invest the resources to create patches. What Google can't do is get those patches delivered to end-user devices. Given the fact that if Google provided patches they'd never reach users anyway, why should Google bother? And we know that OEMs won't provide updates because they are already refusing to provide the one that has existed for some time now: Android 4.4. (Disclaimer: I'm a Google employee, and I work on Android security, but I'm not a spokesperson and these are only my own opinions.)
- anon1385 12y ago>What Google can't do is get those patches delivered to end-user devices. Apple manage to do it. Google made a conscious decision to trade off allowing end users to keep up to date with achieving faster adoption of Android among OEMs and carriers. You can't now pretend that the results of those decisions are some kind of inevitability. It was Google's choice, and they are responsible for the result. >And we know that OEMs won't provide updates because they are already refusing to provide the one that has existed for some time now: Android 4.4. Yes, OEMs like Google themselves…
- divegeek 12y agoApple makes all of its devices and therefore controls them. Google can't dictate to Samsung, HTC, LG, etc. Google has updated the in-support Nexus devices. The Galaxy Nexus is something of a question mark, but the number of active Galaxy Nexus devices is tiny. It would make more sense for Google to offer GNex users a new device than to upgrade the few remaining GNex's to 4.4.