I have not heard of "GamerGate". While reading the first half of the article, I thought it was intended to sound ironic. I had a hard time to find out what side

I have not heard of "GamerGate". While reading the first half of the article, I thought it was intended to sound ironic. I had a hard time to find out what side he is on and what the actual point is. When you criticize an institution the size of Wikipedia over one aspect of their culture and illustrate this through some fight of teenage boys vs feminists, then conclude that the institution is therefor doomed and go on to encourage people to tweet that they are not donating to it anymore, you risk to sound very childish. Especially when the article is written that bad. On the other hand, I do not know him so this could also be a fantastically executed troll.