3 ms·
Oh yes, I agree. Standard probability notation is handy and fast but just depends too much on the context. I wonder if someone has created a more orthogonal no
by nova 17y ago
Oh yes, I agree. Standard probability notation is handy and fast but just depends too much on the context.
I wonder if someone has created a more orthogonal notation for probability, like Sussman did with the Schemish/functional notation for differential geometry.
- eru 17y agoAny good pointers to Sussman's notation?