3 ms·

Men die earlier, yes. You have a point there. [2][3] says that ~90999/100000 males survive to age 60 and ~94194/100000 females survive to age 60. That's a diffe

Men die earlier, yes. You have a point there. [2][3] says that ~90999/100000 males survive to age 60 and ~94194/100000 females survive to age 60. That's a difference of ~3195/100000, or ~3.2%. However, the question becomes if men retire earlier. And the answer is no. [1] Women retire earlier than men on average (at least in Canada. Don't have stats handy for anywhere else, unfortunately). And that's measured in years, more than compensating for the above. Regarding disabled people, a simple answer is that society as a whole would be against it, as there is enough of a chance of any individual person becoming disabled that it is in their best interest to not allow such a law. And making an argument from an economic as opposed to a moralistic point of view does not make one a sociopath. As you may not have noticed, I never mentioned my moral point of view on the matter, as it's irrelevant. [1] http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-222-x/2008001/sectionm/m-age-eng.htm http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-222-x/2008001/sectionm/m-age... [2] http://www.prdh.umontreal.ca/BDLC/data/can/mltper_1x5.txt http://www.prdh.umontreal.ca/BDLC/data/can/mltper_1x5.txt [3] http://www.prdh.umontreal.ca/BDLC/data/can/fltper_1x5.txt http://www.prdh.umontreal.ca/BDLC/data/can/fltper_1x5.txt [4] http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2012002/article/11697-eng.pdf http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2012002/article/11697-...

czep 12y ago
Men at all age levels have higher insurance rates than women. This means they are riskier employees than women and if the reason women are being paid less is purely economic then the situation ought to be reversed and men should be paid less because of the higher risk. So clearly the reason is not economic but is a systemic bias. Yes, making an argument involving decisions that affect the life chances of human beings and hiding behind "economic theory" is sociopathic.
- nawitus 12y ago
  >Men at all age levels have higher insurance rates than women. This means they are riskier employees than women and if the reason women are being paid less is purely economic then the situation ought to be reversed and men should be paid less because of the higher risk. That assumes that only insurance-based risk affects economics.

czep 12y ago

Men at all age levels have higher insurance rates than women. This means they are riskier employees than women and if the reason women are being paid less is purely economic then the situation ought to be reversed and men should be paid less because of the higher risk. So clearly the reason is not economic but is a systemic bias. Yes, making an argument involving decisions that affect the life chances of human beings and hiding behind "economic theory" is sociopathic.

nawitus 12y ago
>Men at all age levels have higher insurance rates than women. This means they are riskier employees than women and if the reason women are being paid less is purely economic then the situation ought to be reversed and men should be paid less because of the higher risk. That assumes that only insurance-based risk affects economics.