3 ms·

How many years of failure would it take before you would seriously consider this hypothesis? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology_evolution/art

• DannoHung 17y ago
  How many operational failures were there, exactly? I think it was at least 2 or 3 fairly large setbacks, right? I guess the problem here is just how damn long the system takes to cycle up and down. I imagine if the LHC could turn on and off within a few hours we would have seen the entire facility blow up if the theory were true.
• robryan 17y ago
  I propose an alternate theory in which the LHC does destroy the world thereby never allowing time travel to be developed.